Full Professor
Department of Philosophy
University of Rijeka
EmailResearch Overview
Here, together with my research associates, I focus on different types of cognitive means (mostly, scientific laws, causal concepts such as mechanisms and causal pathways, and scientific models) through which we maximize our understanding of the living world. We closely look at explanatory strategies deployed by, primarily, molecular and evolutionary biologists. In particular, we try to clarify the structure of the strategies, the assumptions on which they tacitly rely, and how they relate to other basic scientific procedures, such as, medical interventions.
This notion is examined not only in the sense of an ‘aha feeling’, but, primarily, for the following two general reasons: (1) as related to the above notion of scientific explanation; and (2) as related to the issue of non-factivism or/and non-veritism, that is, departures from truth, in explaining natural phenomena. To put both points more schematically, I am explicating this locution: S understands that X because Y, where S is an explanation seeker (scientist or, more realistically, a certain scientific community), X the explanandum phenomenon, and Y the explanans. Accordingly, I focus on the puzzle concerned with the role of idealizations in explaining natural phenomena. That is, despite securing significant cognitive benefits, truth or accuracy are not fully among them, given the falsifying, misrepresenting feature of scientific idealizations. Now, it seems that a philosophical examination of scientific understanding comes to the rescue in dealing with the puzzle in question.
(i) My research on biological functions is part of a collaborative program with Zdenka Brzović. We address the question what is the adequate notion of function in biology, specifically, in the area of genome biology. Also, we address whether the account we defend can be transferred to medicine, where the notion under consideration is used in defining the neighboring notions of health and disease.
(ii) Finally, I assess current general trends, both in the philosophy of biology and in the life sciences, in emphasizing distinct roles played by a scientific metaphor; especially, the theoretical roles, most notably, the explanatory role. In that regard, I steer a middle course between overly enthusiastic and sceptical stances.
Short Bio
2016
Minister, Ministry of Science, Education and Sport
2009 – 2015
Dean, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka
2003 - 2009
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka
2003
PhD in Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Padua
1999
MA in Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Padua
1994
MSc in Molecular Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Zagreb
Awards
2018: Award from Croatian Institute of Philosophy for the best student essay (PhD level) in the academic year 2017/2018.
2018: Award for Excellence from the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka for young researchers in Humanities
Selected Publications
2021
Brzović, Z., Balorda, V., Šustar, P.
Explanatory Hierarchy of Causal Structures in Molecular Biology“, European Journal for Philosophy of Science
European Journal for Philosophy of Science (Springer Nature), 11.'
2020
Brzović, Z. & Šustar, P.
Postgenomics Function Monism
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (Elsevier), 80
2014
Šustar, P. & Brzović, Z.
Natural Selection and the Function Debate: Between ‘Cheap Tricks’ and Evolutionary Neutrality
Synthese, 191, 2653-2671
2007
Šustar, P.
Crick's Notion of Genetic Information and the 'Central Dogma' of Molecular Biology
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Oxford University Press), 58 , 13-24.